Cultural Evolution and the 2024 U.S. Election
Analyzing Selection by Consequences and Behavior Shifts in a Polarized Political Landscape
Introduction
The unprecedented social and political landscape of the United States leading up to the 2024 presidential election demonstrated significant dynamics driven by the ongoing cultural evolution and consequent behavior shifts. To fully understand the factors that shaped Trump's re-election in 2024, it is crucial to analyze how cultural narratives, societal values, and behavioral adaptations were intertwined by selection by consequences to shape and select the electoral outcomes.
This essay takes an evolutionary approach to analyzing the election outcome. This approach provides a proven methodology for analyzing the intricate relationships between cultural evolution, individual behavior, and the political selection process in our contemporary culture.
Our objective is not to be political or take sides. We attempt to present an analysis of the electorate's choice behavior and the behavior/cultural dynamics of our current social environment by identifying some of the multiple factors and consequences that contributed to the outcome.
Selection by Consequences
The core of our analysis lies in the evolutionary science of selection by consequences. This principle demonstrates that behaviors are shaped and reinforced by their outcomes (consequences) in a given environment. Operant conditioning is a significant player in selection by consequences, where positive and negative reinforcement play crucial roles in shaping individual actions.
A similar dynamic exists in the political environment: candidates and political movements adapt their messages and strategies based on the electorate's perceived needs, wants, and responses. This symbiosis creates a feedback loop in which individuals adjust their beliefs and behaviors in response to the prevailing cultural narratives and political climate.
In the context of the 2024 election, Trump's and Harris’s actions, messages, and rhetoric were selected by their consequences. Trump’s ability to adapt to the cultural zeitgeist—exploiting grievances and tapping into the sentiments of disillusionment among specific voter demographics—reflects an outcome due to the selection process by consequences. Trump’s messages resonated with a substantial base that felt marginalized and ignored by traditional political narratives, reinforcing their allegiance through reciprocal reinforcement that shapes and maintains such behavior. These influences occur blind to most of us behaving. They are usually unguided and with no intent. The fact is that when we behave, we are mostly unaware of the contingencies/consequences governing our behavior at the time. Our behavior changes and adapts secondary to the prevailing consequences in place.
Contemporary Cultural Evolution
The United States has noticed noticeable shifts transforming political sensitivity. Technological advancements, demographic changes, and evolving social values often drive these shifts. Social media has transformed how information is disseminated and consumed, shaping micro-communities that reinforce niche culture identities. This digital ecosystem has allowed for the rapid spread of ideas and emotions, nurturing a culture that often diverges from mainstream narratives. Leading up to the 2024 election, Trump’s campaign responded to these cultural shifts. The cultural evolution in the U.S. saw a rise in populism and national sentiments, which are explained by increasing dissatisfaction with globalization, immigration, and economic inequalities. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated feelings of uncertainty and fear. Trump shaped his message to promise a return to perceived American greatness.
In addition, the polarization of cultural narratives around issues such as climate change, racial justice, and healthcare has promoted a growing divide within the electorate. Trump’s positioning—often dismissive of progressive agendas—appealed to those who felt alienated by the rapid evolutionary social changes, facilitating a resurgence of conservative values as a counter-response. Through selection by consequences, constituents rallied around a leader they perceived as standing against an evolving cultural tide that threatened their identities.
Individual Behavior Shifts:
In a political context, societal norms and collective sentiments heavily influence individual behavior. The 2024 election represented a significant moment in which personal beliefs, fueled by cultural evolution, converged to create a collective behavioral shift among voters. Factors such as online discourse, community engagement, and identity politics culminated in a redefined electorate that sought authenticity and alignment with their values.
Trump re-emerged as the Republican candidate and embodied the committed values with which many voters resonated. His approach was marked by a directness that contrasted starkly with political correctness, appealing to individuals searching for an unfiltered representation of their frustrations. This behavior shift from traditional values towards a more aggressive and simplistic approach was reinforced by his followers, thus gaining traction in a society burdened with complexity and ambiguity.
The growth of political populism, intertwined with cultural nostalgia, prompted individuals to re-evaluate their political affiliation. Many former Democrats and moderate Republicans gravitated toward Trump, predominantly driven by the expectation for change and as a challenge to the status quo. This shift illustrates how individual behavior can drastically change when reinforced by a social environment defined by cultural turmoil and a longing for decisive leadership.
The Role of Media and Narrative
The role of media, mainly social media, cannot be dismissed in the context of selection by consequences and electoral behavior. Instagram, Facebook, and other platforms function as amplifiers for political messaging, providing visibility to ideas that might otherwise remain on the fringe. Trump’s adept use of these platforms augmented his campaign and shaped individual engagement and behavior.
The narrative constructed around Trump’s persona often revolved around themes of anti-establishment sentiment, personal resilience, and American exceptionalism. His campaigns were punctuated with stark binaries of “us versus them,” creating an “in-group” mentality that fostered and reinforced loyalty. The consequences of this narrative were transformative—his followers increasingly adopted behaviors and ideologies reflective of these themes, reinforcing their identity by political alignment.
Conversely, mainstream media often portrayed Trump as a polarizing figure and a challenge to democratic norms. These portrayals acted as a mechanism for selection by consequences; the more he was vilified, the more certain population segments were validated in their support for him. Thus, both supportive and oppositional narratives played into a complex and reciprocal shaping of individual behaviors, reinforcing existing divisions within the electorate and contributing to a markedly polarized political culture.
Implications for Future Elections
Trump’s re-election in 2024 emerged as a confluence of cultural evolution, individual behavior shifts, and selection by consequences. The intricate relationship between evolving societal norms and voter behavior demonstrates the nuances behind electoral outcomes in a very fast-evolving political landscape. As the United States moves forward, understanding these dynamics will be crucial for political candidates and for a broader comprehension of how democracy functions in a time of defined cultural complexity and diverse narratives. The future of politics in the United States may reflect the lessons learned from the interactions of culture, identity, and individual agency as the electorate continues to navigate and behave within the context of an evolving landscape.
Thank you and please pass it on.
Some interesting points you all raised and ways in which you phrased them.
Some other factors (trying to be apolitical in listing these without claiming how they might have swayed voters)
- attempted assassinations and indictments toward Pres. Trump
- felt economic turmoil
- VP Harris not going through a new primary before assuming the candidacy
- transgenderism, children’s surgeries and hormone treatments, and girls’ sports
- open, insecure borders
- Ukraine and Russia
- Israel and Gaza
I think it will be interesting to see how some of what was warned by the DNC will either come true versus not and which things are ultimately for the better or for the worse.